Russia's population crisis: A shrinking and aging nation, and a controversial approach to combat it
For over two decades, President Vladimir Putin has been grappling with a daunting challenge: Russia's declining and aging population. This issue, which has haunted the country for years, is now being addressed through a series of restrictive laws, sparking controversy and raising important questions.
In 1999, a year before Putin's rise to power, Russia witnessed a record low in the number of births. Putin, recognizing the urgency, emphasized the need for "social and economic stability" to tackle this demographic crisis. However, despite initial progress, with births increasing alongside economic prosperity, recent years have seen a reversal of these gains.
The war in Ukraine, financial uncertainty, and the exodus of young men have contributed to a crumbling birth rate. Russia's population has decreased from 147.6 million in 1990 to 146.1 million in the present year, with a significant shift towards an older demographic. In 1990, only 21.1% of the population was 55 or older, but this figure has jumped to 30% in 2024.
The number of births has been declining annually since the peak in 2015, and deaths now outpace births. This trend is alarming, with the number of live births in 2024 barely surpassing the record low of 1999. Demographer Alexei Raksha reported that the monthly birth rate in February 2025 was the lowest in over two centuries.
In response, Russia is implementing new restrictions, embracing what it calls "traditional family values." These measures include banning the promotion of abortion and "child-free ideology," as well as outlawing all LGBTQ+ activism. Russian feminist scholar Sasha Talaver believes that these values are seen as a "magic wand" by officials, expecting women to willingly take on the additional role of reproduction for the sake of patriotism and national strength.
The link between economic turbulence and declining births is evident not only in Russia but also in the West. Young couples, facing financial challenges and job insecurity, often hesitate to start families. Russia's demographic history is particularly harsh, with the male population dramatically diminished due to the losses of World War II and the subsequent collapse of the Soviet Union.
The small number of women in their 20s and early 30s has left authorities desperate to encourage as many births as possible. This demographic challenge is further exacerbated by the war in Ukraine, which has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Russian troops, according to Western estimates. Many young Russians have also moved abroad, either to escape political crackdowns or to avoid military service.
Some initiatives, such as cash certificates for parents and state holidays celebrating family values, are popular. However, others, like one-time payments for pregnant teenagers, are controversial. The vague wording of certain laws, such as those banning the "encouragement of abortions" and "child-free propaganda," has led to changes in reality TV shows like "16 and Pregnant," now renamed "Mommy at 16."
For many women, these measures add to the sensitivity of already difficult conversations. A 29-year-old woman who has chosen not to have children explained that she avoids state-run clinics to evade intrusive questions about her reproductive choices.
The increasing number of laws limiting access to abortion is a cause for concern. While the procedure remains legal, the availability has decreased, with more private clinics no longer offering abortion services. The sale of abortion-inducing pills has also been curbed, affecting emergency contraceptives as well. Women are encouraged to go to state clinics, where they face longer waits and the risk of surpassing the legal time frame for abortions due to mandatory counseling and waiting periods.
Activists believe that restricting abortion will harm the health of women and children, with Russian journalist and feminist activist Zalina Marshenkulova stating, "The only thing you will get from this is illegal abortions. That means more deaths: more children's deaths and more women's deaths." She sees these government limits as repression, existing solely to silence voices of freedom.
One potential solution to increase Russia's population is to allow more immigrants. However, the Kremlin is unlikely to adopt this approach, as Russian officials have recently fostered anti-migrant sentiment, tracking their movements, restricting their employment, and impeding their children's access to education. Central Asian workers, traditionally seeking employment in Russia, are now looking elsewhere to avoid discrimination and economic uncertainty.
In the midst of an ongoing war, Moscow can offer financial incentives for prospective parents, but it cannot provide the stability needed for a secure future. As Jenny Mathers, from the University of Aberystwyth in Wales, points out, "When people lack confidence about their prospects, it's not a time for having children. An open-ended major war doesn't really encourage people to think positively about the future."
The 29-year-old woman who chose not to have children echoes this sentiment, stating, "The happiest and healthiest child will only be born in a family with healthy, happy parents."
This population crisis in Russia raises important questions about the balance between personal freedom, reproductive rights, and national security. What do you think? Should governments intervene in such personal matters, or is there a better way to address these demographic challenges?